THE OBJECTIVE OF GROWTH INTO ADULTHOOD

What is objective of growth into adulthood?

Is it to be the biggest, baddest fascist on the planet? The person with the most money, the most high-tech, the most influence, the most......,?

No it is not. On an individual growth basis, the objective of growth into (real) adulthood is to have an apposite ego structure. There are many paths but they all contain some basic ingredients.

For a quick snap-shot of what the term means think the compassionate, decent human relationships of the greats and the persons they were.

Think, say: Jesus, Ghandi, Buddaha, Martin Luther King, Jr, any of those religious leaders with those qualities.... Mohammed?

You may or may not speak of their divinity. Either way, all will get the same common denominator from them. All those who preached and practiced a basic " Do unto others..." Those are the greats.

Then to fill in the picture, think Maslow's self-actualizing characteristics as given by the psychologist Abraham Maslow.

But it takes a lot to produce such individuals from the raw human stock. You hardly ever see what it takes , but it takes a lot.

It takes proper family systems, proper peer and social environments and such cultures or socio-cultures. It takes role-models, it takes a good amount of the proper life experiences..... Communities rich in these, in values and experiences and structured to impart these; religions properly centered and in an individual rights context or some systematic structure for others. Most humans learn mainly through social exposure and context,..... Apprenticeships not even seen as such. It takes these.

A multibillion dollar trust fund is not necessary for growth into that objective, but of course there are those with such fortunes and that state of being.

Some will say it takes acts of divinity. Some will not bother to argue that point because it also takes all of the above. Take but one example. Closely analyze the family and social environment a Jesus, say came from.

That I say is the objective of growth into adulthood. Whether it is minimum or sufficient some will refuse to debate the point. Any which way you take it, BE of that state, be consistent and determined in the process of arriving at that state, and watch the quality of the change, the decisive improvement , in the world around us.

Let me round–off the picture some more. Another aspect to the apposite is that of rationality. Such individuals have deep intellectual integrity. They apply reason and purpose in all that they do, and are rounded enough, free enough inside , to not apply these in those few circumstances. But the tenor of their lives is that of reason and purpose.

The apposite means character; and all the virtues required of and for good character.

The apposite is a wholesome self-esteem with the emotional basis of this self-esteem usually formed thru a childhood/upbringing that is positive, nurturing, affirming of self and selfhood, a growth into adulthood of unconditional love.

A self-esteem not obtained at the expense of others or defined in terms of others or defined solely in terms of material achievements, and not taught to be so. If this emotional base was unfortunately not there, one can take oneself thru the paces to correct for the base one had.

The apposite is that well-balanced person connecting, and connecting well, to all aspects of life.

On the family systems that make all this more likely, see the works of psychologist John Bradshaw , and others like him.

Below are some of the Maslow’s Self-Actualizing Characteristics and these corresponds to those of the apposite. Here Maslow enumerates his observations, but he was not in possession of the other psychological developments in terms of family systems and the formation of self-image/self-concept we now have, as in the works of a John Bradshaw.

#####################################

Some Maslow's Self-Actualizing Characteristics
• keen sense of reality - aware of real situations - objective judgement,
rather than subjective
• see problems in terms of challenges and situations requiring solutions,
rather than see problems as personal complaints or excuses
• need for privacy and comfortable being alone
• reliant on own experiences and judgement - independent - not reliant on
culture and environment to form opinions and views
• not susceptible to social pressures - non-conformist
• democratic, fair and non-discriminating - embracing and enjoying all
cultures, races and individual styles
• socially compassionate - possessing humanity
• accepting others as they are and not trying to change people
• comfortable with oneself - despite any unconventional tendencies
• a few close intimate friends rather than many surface relationships
• sense of humour directed at oneself or the human condition, rather than at
the expense of others [ Not “Dissing”, name calling]
• spontaneous and natural - true to oneself, rather than being how others want
• excited and interested in everything, even ordinary things
• creative, inventive and original
• seek peak experiences that leave a lasting impression.
• these qualities flow naturally, without effort from the individual

Abraham Maslow was born in New York in 1908 and died in 1970, although various publications appear in Maslow's name in later years. Maslow's PhD in psychology in 1934 at the University of Wisconsin formed the basis of his motivational research.

To derive his notion of self-actualization he looked at the kind of people he called self-actualizers using a qualitative method called biographical analysis.
Included in this august group were Abraham Lincoln, Thomas Jefferson, Albert Einstein, Eleanor Roosevelt, Jane Adams, William James, Albert Schweitzer, Benedict Spinoza, and Alduous Huxley, plus 12 unnamed people who were alive at the time Maslow did his research. He then looked at their biographies, writings, the acts and words of those he knew personally, and so on. From these sources, he developed a list of qualities that seemed characteristic of these people, as opposed to the great mass of us.

Sources: 1. http://www.ship.edu/%7Ecgboeree/maslow.html
2. http://www.businessballs.com/maslow.htm
3. http://chiron.valdosta.edu/whuitt/col/regsys/maslow.html
4. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow%27s_hierarchy_of_needs

BUSH, 62 MILLION SOULS, THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND TIs



President Bush:

62 million souls died in WW11. Did they die in vain.
Did any one inform you that they did not die just to defeat Hitler ?

I don't think so.

On their blood was forged the International Convention on Civil and Political/Human Rights. Many real Christians and others struggled to have those principles codified in that Convention.

And in the space of one generation, the fist crop of baby boomer
you stand guilty of violations of:

Article 7
Article 10.1
" 18.1
" 18.2
" 19.1
" 19. 2
" 19.3
All OF PART 111


You , Clinton, those in your administation and so many others of first crop boomers and older. What went wrong.

These are violation against thousands WITH YOUR GOVERNMENT'S ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES, ILLEGALLY TARGETED AT INDIVIDUALS, ( TIs) AND NOT TO MENTION THOSE OTHER ABUSES THE "PRESS" HAS BEEN SANCTIONED, OR HAS SANCTIONED ITSELF, TO AT LEAST WRITE ABOUT.

ONE GENERATION. WHAT WENT WRONG.
62 million to establish that civilized standard for expected behaviour , especially from governments
WHAT WENT WRONG.


I suppose it did not help that your, father who fought in that war and should have made sacred in your heart WHY those 62 million perished,
was the one to start the above & violations.

So why did he fight in WW11. A good career move?

And since you have NEVER read the Convention it is included below:
( at least to article 19. See http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/a_ccpr.htm
for the rest)

I ask that you kindly have you government(s) desist these activities against such individuals, their lives and the quality of my their lives.

Thank you very much.


WE WANT ELECTED OFFICIALS; CONGRESS, SENATE AND PRESIDENT
WHO WILL RESOLVE THIS TI ISSUE, CORRECTLY, THE WAY IT SHOULD BE RESOLVED AND STOPPED!!!


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

Adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by
General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI) of 16 December 1966
entry into force 23 March 1976, in accordance with Article 49

status of ratifications
declarations and reservations

Preamble

The States Parties to the present Covenant,
Considering that, in accordance with the principles proclaimed in the Charter of the United Nations, recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,

Recognizing that these rights derive from the inherent dignity of the human person,

Recognizing that, in accordance with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the ideal of free human beings enjoying civil and political freedom and freedom from fear and want can only be achieved if conditions are created whereby everyone may enjoy his civil and political rights, as well as his economic, social and cultural rights,

Considering the obligation of States under the Charter of the United Nations to promote universal respect for, and observance of, human rights and freedoms,

Realizing that the individual, having duties to other individuals and to the community to which he belongs, is under a responsibility to strive for the promotion and observance of the rights recognized in the present Covenant,

Agree upon the following articles:

PART I
Article 1 General comment on its implementation



1. All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.

2. All peoples may, for their own ends, freely dispose of their natural wealth and resources without prejudice to any obligations arising out of international economic co-operation, based upon the principle of mutual benefit, and international law. In no case may a people be deprived of its own means of subsistence.

3. The States Parties to the present Covenant, including those having responsibility for the administration of Non-Self-Governing and Trust Territories, shall promote the realization of the right of self-determination, and shall respect that right, in conformity with the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations.

PART II
Article 2 General comment on its implementation


1. Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes to respect and to ensure to all individuals within its territory and subject to its jurisdiction the rights recognized in the present Covenant, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.

2. Where not already provided for by existing legislative or other measures, each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes to take the necessary steps, in accordance with its constitutional processes and with the provisions of the present Covenant, to adopt such laws or other measures as may be necessary to give effect to the rights recognized in the present Covenant.


3. Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes:

(a) To ensure that any person whose rights or freedoms as herein recognized are violated shall have an effective remedy, notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity;

(b) To ensure that any person claiming such a remedy shall have his right thereto determined by competent judicial, administrative or legislative authorities, or by any other competent authority provided for by the legal system of the State, and to develop the possibilities of judicial remedy;

(c) To ensure that the competent authorities shall enforce such remedies when granted.

Article 3 General comment on its implementation

The States Parties to the present Covenant undertake to ensure the equal right of men and women to the enjoyment of all civil and political rights set forth in the present Covenant. General comment on its implementation

Article 4 General comment on its implementation
1 . In time of public emergency which threatens the life of the nation and the existence of which is officially proclaimed, the States Parties to the present Covenant may take measures derogating from their obligations under the present Covenant to the extent strictly required by the exigencies of the situation, provided that such measures are not inconsistent with their other obligations under international law and do not involve discrimination solely on the ground of race, colour, sex, language, religion or social origin.

2. No derogation from articles 6, 7, 8 (paragraphs I and 2), 11, 15, 16 and 18 may be made under this provision.

3. Any State Party to the present Covenant availing itself of the right of derogation shall immediately inform the other States Parties to the present Covenant, through the intermediary of the Secretary-General of the United Nations, of the provisions from which it has derogated and of the reasons by which it was actuated. A further communication shall be made, through the same intermediary, on the date on which it terminates such derogation.General comment on its implementation

Article 5
1. Nothing in the present Covenant may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms recognized herein or at their limitation to a greater extent than is provided for in the present Covenant.

2. There shall be no restriction upon or derogation from any of the fundamental human rights recognized or existing in any State Party to the present Covenant pursuant to law, conventions, regulations or custom on the pretext that the present Covenant does not recognize such rights or that it recognizes them to a lesser extent.

PART III
Article 6 General comment on its implementation



1. Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life.

2. In countries which have not abolished the death penalty, sentence of death may be imposed only for the most serious crimes in accordance with the law in force at the time of the commission of the crime and not contrary to the provisions of the present Covenant and to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. This penalty can only be carried out pursuant to a final judgement rendered by a competent court.

3. When deprivation of life constitutes the crime of genocide, it is understood that nothing in this article shall authorize any State Party to the present Covenant to derogate in any way from any obligation assumed under the provisions of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.

4. Anyone sentenced to death shall have the right to seek pardon or commutation of the sentence. Amnesty, pardon or commutation of the sentence of death may be granted in all cases.

5. Sentence of death shall not be imposed for crimes committed by persons below eighteen years of age and shall not be carried out on pregnant women.

6. Nothing in this article shall be invoked to delay or to prevent the abolition of capital punishment by any State Party to the present Covenant.

Article 7 General comment on its implementation

No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.

Article 8

1. No one shall be held in slavery; slavery and the slave-trade in all their forms shall be prohibited.

2. No one shall be held in servitude.

3.

(a) No one shall be required to perform forced or compulsory labour;
(b) Paragraph 3 (a) shall not be held to preclude, in countries where imprisonment with hard labour may be imposed as a punishment for a crime, the performance of hard labour in pursuance of a sentence to such punishment by a competent court;

(c) For the purpose of this paragraph the term "forced or compulsory labour" shall not include:

(i) Any work or service, not referred to in subparagraph (b), normally required of a person who is under detention in consequence of a lawful order of a court, or of a person during conditional release from such detention;
(ii) Any service of a military character and, in countries where conscientious objection is recognized, any national service required by law of conscientious objectors;

(iii) Any service exacted in cases of emergency or calamity threatening the life or well-being of the community;

(iv) Any work or service which forms part of normal civil obligations.

Article 9 General comment on its implementation

1. Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest or detention. No one shall be deprived of his liberty except on such grounds and in accordance with such procedure as are established by law.
2. Anyone who is arrested shall be informed, at the time of arrest, of the reasons for his arrest and shall be promptly informed of any charges against him.

3. Anyone arrested or detained on a criminal charge shall be brought promptly before a judge or other officer authorized by law to exercise judicial power and shall be entitled to trial within a reasonable time or to release. It shall not be the general rule that persons awaiting trial shall be detained in custody, but release may be subject to guarantees to appear for trial, at any other stage of the judicial proceedings, and, should occasion arise, for execution of the judgement.

4. Anyone who is deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention shall be entitled to take proceedings before a court, in order that court may decide without delay on the lawfulness of his detention and order his release if the detention is not lawful.

5. Anyone who has been the victim of unlawful arrest or detention shall have an enforceable right to compensation.

Article 10 General comment on its implementation
1. All persons deprived of their liberty shall be treated with humanity and with respect for the inherent dignity of the human person.
2.

(a) Accused persons shall, save in exceptional circumstances, be segregated from convicted persons and shall be subject to separate treatment appropriate to their status as unconvicted persons;
(b) Accused juvenile persons shall be separated from adults and brought as speedily as possible for adjudication. 3. The penitentiary system shall comprise treatment of prisoners the essential aim of which shall be their reformation and social rehabilitation. Juvenile offenders shall be segregated from adults and be accorded treatment appropriate to their age and legal status.

Article 11
No one shall be imprisoned merely on the ground of inability to fulfil a contractual obligation.

Article 12 General comment on its implementation
1. Everyone lawfully within the territory of a State shall, within that territory, have the right to liberty of movement and freedom to choose his residence.
2. Everyone shall be free to leave any country, including his own.

3. The above-mentioned rights shall not be subject to any restrictions except those which are provided by law, are necessary to protect national security, public order (ordre public), public health or morals or the rights and freedoms of others, and are consistent with the other rights recognized in the present Covenant.

4. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of the right to enter his own country.


Article 13
An alien lawfully in the territory of a State Party to the present Covenant may be expelled therefrom only in pursuance of a decision reached in accordance with law and shall, except where compelling reasons of national security otherwise require, be allowed to submit the reasons against his expulsion and to have his case reviewed by, and be represented for the purpose before, the competent authority or a person or persons especially designated by the competent authority.

Article 14 General comment on its implementation

1. All persons shall be equal before the courts and tribunals. In the determination of any criminal charge against him, or of his rights and obligations in a suit at law, everyone shall be entitled to a fair and public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal established by law. The press and the public may be excluded from all or part of a trial for reasons of morals, public order (ordre public) or national security in a democratic society, or when the interest of the private lives of the parties so requires, or to the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice; but any judgement rendered in a criminal case or in a suit at law shall be made public except where the interest of juvenile persons otherwise requires or the proceedings concern matrimonial disputes or the guardianship of children.

2. Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall have the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law.

3. In the determination of any criminal charge against him, everyone shall be entitled to the following minimum guarantees, in full equality:

(a) To be informed promptly and in detail in a language which he understands of the nature and cause of the charge against him;
(b) To have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of his defence and to communicate with counsel of his own choosing;

(c) To be tried without undue delay;

(d) To be tried in his presence, and to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing; to be informed, if he does not have legal assistance, of this right; and to have legal assistance assigned to him, in any case where the interests of justice so require, and without payment by him in any such case if he does not have sufficient means to pay for it;

(e) To examine, or have examined, the witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him;

(f) To have the free assistance of an interpreter if he cannot understand or speak the language used in court;

(g) Not to be compelled to testify against himself or to confess guilt.

4. In the case of juvenile persons, the procedure shall be such as will take account of their age and the desirability of promoting their rehabilitation.

5. Everyone convicted of a crime shall have the right to his conviction and sentence being reviewed by a higher tribunal according to law.

6. When a person has by a final decision been convicted of a criminal offence and when subsequently his conviction has been reversed or he has been pardoned on the ground that a new or newly discovered fact shows conclusively that there has been a miscarriage of justice, the person who has suffered punishment as a result of such conviction shall be compensated according to law, unless it is proved that the non-disclosure of the unknown fact in time is wholly or partly attributable to him.

7. No one shall be liable to be tried or punished again for an offence for which he has already been finally convicted or acquitted in accordance with the law and penal procedure of each country.

Article 15
1 . No one shall be held guilty of any criminal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a criminal offence, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time when the criminal offence was committed. If, subsequent to the commission of the offence, provision is made by law for the imposition of the lighter penalty, the offender shall benefit thereby.

2. Nothing in this article shall prejudice the trial and punishment of any person for any act or omission which, at the time when it was committed, was criminal according to the general principles of law recognized by the community of nations.

Article 16
Everyone shall have the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.

Article 17 General comment on its implementation

1. No one shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to unlawful attacks on his honour and reputation.

2. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

Article 18 General comment on its implementation

1. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. This right shall include freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of his choice, and freedom, either individually or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in worship, observance, practice and teaching.

2. No one shall be subject to coercion which would impair his freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of his choice.

3. Freedom to manifest one's religion or beliefs may be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary to protect public safety, order, health, or morals or the fundamental rights and freedoms of others. 4. The States Parties to the present Covenant undertake to have respect for the liberty of parents and, when applicable, legal guardians to ensure the religious and moral education of their children in conformity with their own convictions.

Article 19 General comment on its implementation

1. Everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference.

2. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice.

3. The exercise of the rights provided for in paragraph 2 of this article carries with it special duties and responsibilities. It may therefore be subject to certain restrictions, but these shall only be such as are provided by law and are necessary:

(a) For respect of the rights or reputations of others;

(b) For the protection of national security or of public order (ordre public), or of public health or morals.

---------------------------------

BLOG: THE ROOT OF THE MIDDLE EAST PROBLEM:

MY COMMENT ON MR BRICMONT”S ARTICLE
“The De-Zionization of the American Mind
By JEAN BRICMONT”
IN COUNTERPUNCH , AUGST 12/13 2006
http://www.counterpunch.org/

The gist on Mr Bricmont’s argument and logic starts with the intense hatred felt by the people’s of the Middle East for the US. Some quotes are:.
“But the level of hatred that leads a large number of people to applaud an event like September 11 is peculiar to the Middle East….

That much was understood by Americans leaders and infuriated them. Such a level of hatred calls for explanation…….

And there can be only one explanation: United States support for Israel.

Why is Israel so hated? The constant stalling of "peace plans" in favor of more settlements and more war aggravates that hatred, but the basic cause lies in the very principles on which that state is build. There are basically two arguments that have justified establishing the State of Israel in Palestine: one is that God gave that land to the Jews, and the other is the Holocaust. The first one is deeply insulting to people who are profoundly religious, like most Arabs, but of another creed. And, for the second, it amounts to making people pay for a crime that they did not commit”



He goes on: “(I am not arguing here in favour of « wiping Israel off the map », or in favor of a « one state solution » but simply underlining what seems to me to be the root and the depth of the problem. In fact, I am not arguing for any solution partly because none seems to me to be attainable in the short term, but, more fundamentally, because I do not think that outsiders to the Middle East should propose such solutions.)”


And he suggests:]

“What should the Left do? Well, simple: treat Israel as it did South Africa and attack the Lobby.”

Mr Bricmont may be correct as to “the root and depth of the problem”; those two arguments that justified the establishing of the State of Israel in Palestine.
But the outcome did not have to be as we are witnessing and have been witnessing.

Firstly, it is my understanding that the State of Israel was legally established under the prevailing international laws of the time. It is not the case of an illegal invasion. Hence the legality of Israel’s existence is secure. Correct me if I am in error.

Where I think things began to fall apart was that, not enough effort on the humanity side done when Israel was established or in the lead –up to its establishment. A much greater effort should have been made in appealing to the humanity of the Palestinians and Arabs, to allow these long suffering peoples of so many pogroms, a homeland where they can at last feel secure.

The Arab leaders, intelligentsia and as many ordinary folks as possible, should have been taken on tours of the concentration camps after WW11. They should have been educated about the history of European plight of the Jews. Promises on compensation, the proposed relationship between Jews and Arabs / Palestinians, should have been made and fastidiously kept, knowing that there will be rough spots , but the good faith is there.

So having made this point and understanding WHY things went wrong, there can be hope for a two state solution. In the years since Israel’s establishment, many external factors , now including religiosities , have played to exacerbate the situation.

If ALL parties keep their eyes on the goal of having modern civilized states, and having the relationships that exists among such states ( eg , say, the Scandinavian states) then, there is real hope for a solution.

At such time, or even before, it would be cathartic to admit to these errors, to even have a public pageant play that portrays the things that should have been done and that includes all the appropriate humanitarian reactions, befitting peoples with a real humanity.

As to why this all out effort was not made at the very beginning…? Maybe people back then were just not as professional as people are today. Well, at least, some people are today i.e. those government apparatchiks and leaders that use their thoroughness in a negative Machiavellian way.

BLOG: NO. YOU DON'T NEED THE HARD EVIDENCE TO BELIEVE IN ... SATELLITE, MICROWAVE BASED, MIND INFLUENCING/INTERFERING SYSTEM/TECHNOLOGY


.....and you can also read the previous post : THE PHYSICS OF THE SATELLITE MICROWAVE BASED MIND INFLUENCING/INTERFERING SYSTEM/TECHNOLOGY



Those “mind interfering” weapons also called psychotronic weapons; are real. They are “highly” classified so the hard data on them is hard to come by , but I’m sure not impossible. I’m sure there are organizations out there working on this.

There is the following evidence as to their reality

a) Some victim organizations are meeting with some members of Congress.
on the matter.

b) The EU has passed a resolution on these weapons but it has not gone beyond that stage See:

http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm

On January 1999 the European Parliament passed a resolution where it (in paragraph 27) calls "for an international convention introducing a global ban on all developments and deployments of weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human beings".
It is our conviction that this ban can not be implemented without the global pressure of the informed general public on the governments. Our major objective is to get across to the general public the real threat which those weapons represent for human rights and democracy and to apply pressure on the governments and parliaments around the world to enact legislature which would prohibit the use of those devices to both government and private organizations as well as individuals.
mbabacek

c) These weapons are banned in the Russian Republic

See : http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm



The Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation , STATE DUMA Committee on Security concluded November 30 2000 number 28/3:
On the project of Federal law "On Inclusion of Addendum to the Article 6 of the Federal law "On weapon".

The draft of the law proposes an addendum to Article 6 of the Federal law "On Weapons" with a regulation, in accordance with which the circulation, in a civilian and military capacity, of weapons and other objects, the offensive operations of which are based on the use of electro-magnetic radiation, infra-sonic radiation and ultra-sonic radiation, is prohibited on the territory of the Russian Federation


d) The weapons form part of the larger picture/agenda


See http://www.sarafrazan.net/to%20the%20people%20of%20free%20iran.htm

Agenda xx:

There is no doubt that the US and the UK were behind the removal of the Shah. The problem for the US/UK was that the leading force inside Iran working to remove the Shah were progressives, led largely by the Iranian Socialist Workers’ Party. Therefore, in November 1978, President Carter named the Bilderberg group’s George Ball, another member of the Trilateral Commission, to head a special White House Iran task force under the National Security Council’s Brzezinski. Ball recommended that Washington drop support for the Shah of Iran and support the fundamentalist Islamic opposition of Khomeini.

Their scheme was based on a detailed study of the phenomenon of Islamic fundamentalism, as presented by British Islamic expert, Dr. Bernard Lewis … Lewis’s scheme was unveiled at the May 1979 Bilderberg meeting in Austria, endorsed the radical Muslim Brotherhood movement behind Khomeini, in order to promote balkanisation of the entire Muslim Near East along tribal and religious lines… The chaos would spread in what he termed an ‘Arc of Crisis,’ which would spill over into the Muslim regions of the Soviet Union.

And see

http://www.nogw.com/


Zionist plan for expansion
1992 "Defense Planning Guidance"

Agenda xx+:

In 1996 an Israeli think tank headed by Richard Pearle drafted "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm". They outlined the plan to reshape the middle east. The first step is to be the removal of Saddam Hussein in Iraq. A war with Iraq will destabilize the entire Middle East, allowing governments in Syria, Iran, Lebanon, and other countries to be replaced.
In September of 2000 the Project for a New American Century (PNAC).published "Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century" gave the details of how their plans are to be carried out. Some key points are:
* Reposition permanently based forces to Southern Europe, Southeast Asia and the Middle East;
* Modernize U.S. forces, including enhancing our fighter aircraft, submarine and surface fleet capabilities;
* Develop and deploy a global missile defense system, and develop a strategic dominance of space by employing spaced based weapons;
* Control the "International Commons" of cyberspace; (The internet)
* Increase defense spending to a minimum of 3.8 percent of gross domestic product, up from the 3 percent currently spent. (Dubya did increase defense spending to exactly 3.8% after he took office.)
"The process of transformation", the plan said, "is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor." (Which we got on 9-11)

Aside from putting weapons in outer space, the most disturbing and ambitious element of the PNAC foreign policy blueprint was the plan to “democratize” the Middle East through military conquest.
+++++++++++++++

Many thought/ assumed that the spaced –based weapons Richard Pearle spoke of were the type of space weapons being planned in the Reagan era. No, they were the psychotronic weapons. These technologies form an integral part of the global agenda. Middle East included.

The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, represents the codification of what it means to be a civilized human being and a civilized society in the 20th century and beyond. The elites of this planet, were globe hopping espousing this standard. Then all of a sudden, because of agendas, a convergence of those with the US far right, that codified standard no , longer need to exists if you have these weapons and can use them illegally, without due process of law?

No, I don’t think so!! We need to get back to that standard.. These vile people we have elected.!

Babacek said : “Our major objective is to get across to the general public the real threat which those weapons represent for human rights and democracy..”

The hard classified data isn’t needed at this point. To wait is to play into the hands of those with the agendas.


I hope there are organizations out there putting together a case based on the International Convention.. and the usage of these technologies/weapons, having learnt from that group in Spain who have brought a case against Pinoche of Chile.


WHAT ALL THIS HAS TO DO WITH CURRENT MIDDLE EAST EVENTS

The agendas/ game-plan being played out now in the middle east is the implementation of that the May 1979 Bilderberg meeting in Austria.
It raises a lot of questions on so much history right up to now.
Can you see some of these questions?

These technologies are right in there being used to the hilt, no doubt.
A recent possible example: after almost a year of pre-planning how to get Hezbullah to "make the incident claimed required".
( All the details of Hezbullas rockets could have been first brought to the
UN Security Council )
(

Some one said ;” Religions like political and social systems evolve and if left in peace they progress according to the understanding and ethics of the people.”

That may be so given certain parameters. But we don’t have the time for that right now. We should hold how, say, the Scandinavian countries behave towards each other as a modern civilized norm for all countries. If two or even one of the parties feel they have to actively pursue a conflagration policy, human dynamics say this will be self-fulfilling. Bilderberg knew this about the Mullahs ( more questions) .

I say place or have the Mullahs place themselves in a State/Mosque separation context which will espouse that modern civilized norm for behaviour between countries, while we in the west and others, can work on those over here with their “agendas and conflagrations” to get them to REALLY conform to that norm.

And of course all adhering to the “International Convention on Human Rights..”

TO THE THOUSANDS OF TI's [ A MUST-SEE PHOTO]


A MUST-SEE Photo to the thousands of TI's ( Targeted Individuals). Those innocent individuals, targeted with neuron assaulting technologies, mainly by the governments ( the US government , mainly) of this world.

They are so innocent, that no legitimate court would issue or validate such an order.

The picture says exactly how they feel
about the abuse they are experiencing.

Example see : Soleilmavis http://www.geocities.com/soleilmavis/
http://spaces.msn.com/soleilmavis
A story of struggling for Freedom and Human Rights

BLOG: THE PHYSICS OF THE SATELLITE MICROWAVE BASED MIND INFLUENCING/INTERFERING SYSTEM/TECHNOLOGY



Now, I am not from the DARPA community. I have never seen any
of these HIGHY classified specs on these systems , so strictly speaking the title should read ; "PROPOSITION : THE PROPOSED PHYSICS OF......"

I can speak with some informed insight as my background is in physics and mathematics B. Sc. If any technical person spots a flaw in my deduction, please post a comment, or drop an email.

No UFO, Rosewel reverse-engineering or black oblisk is required for
these systems. Just some, good ol'e, hard, creative Yankee ingenuity but politically mis-used, as usual, as unfortunately is so often the case.

*******************
The Analyis:


The radiation I suspect they are using is microwave EMF (electromagnetic frequency) radiation. Dr Kilde, in her article [ http://www.mindcontrolforum.com/ Click, Archives /Under Document ,Click Microwave Mind Control, Article by Dr R.. Kilde, MD] she states:”..by using 0.75 milliwatt per square centimeter intensity of pulse
modulated microwaves at a frequency of 450MHz..”

Let me go over some nomenclature to make sure everyone gets the technical jargon.
G – means giga 109 times . Example, a 2 GHz frequency means 2 x 109 vibrations per
second or 2 x 109 Hz (Hertz)
k – means kilo 106 times
m – means milli 10-3 or 1/1000
n - means nano 10-9

Microwaves are EMF just like radio waves but of a different frequency. Officially, microwaves are of the range 1 GHz to 300 GHz which translates to a wavelength of 30 cm to 1 millimeter (mm) respectively.

I suspect they are capable of manipulating individual neurons or small compact groups of neurons. The diameter of a neuron is about 4mm. So microwaves of about 200 -300 GHz will just about have the wavelength of the same size of a neuron and thus can be used to “see” or resolve neurons.

For example, a microscope uses light (which is also EMF) with wavelength about 500nm and so a microscope can resolve objects down to the size of 100 – 200 nm. An electron microscope uses electrons with a wavelength of about 0.01 nm and so can resolve even smaller objects down to a size of about .5 nm

So we see the pattern: the wavelength and the object has to be of the same order of size. For the microwaves and neurons this is 1mm and 4mm respectively. This will do.

The next item in support of my “200 -300GHZ Microwave “Theory” ”is that, when the hurricane Ivan struck, under the tens of miles of thick cloud cover, they were still able inflict those so targeted with “vivid dreams”.

[see http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/12/330672.shtml Greg Szymanski as having "super vivid dreams” as an indicator of the presence of this technologye; others –“electronic weaponry geared at interrupting normal sleep”]

Microwaves above 300 GHz will be easily absorbed by the atmosphere [ see Wikipedia – Microwaves] then the atmosphere starts to allow through higher EMF in the infrared band and above, example light. These experiences with Iva's clouds indicate that the radiation used has to be beloww about 300GHz, if it is not infared. And infared has its own easily detectable problems ( for the users) such as heating and TV remotes. So I 'd say its microwaves about or below 300GHz


As to the physics of how they manipulate actual neurons this is what I think is happening: It is a phenomenon of physics that when a coherent source of EMF is sufficiently intense ( high energy per unit area) a strong electric field is produced . This electric field can then open or close sodium channels of the neurons switching them on or off as required. Then to make the whole system work to produce say a intelligible picture by exciting a particular region of your visual cortex, super massive supercomputing is required, as Dr Kilde stated. Do this to neuron in the visula cortex of the brain and you see images as when you dream. Do it to the auditory section , you hear "inner" voices, etc.


Then to "read" your mind and to have a feedback loop in monitoring what they are doing, a phased array anlysis of the weak return signal is used. Kind of like Doppler radar, but not quite.

They don't "read mind" using your electrical EEG signal as some think. Their microwave ( maser actually) is like a almost passive probe athat uses phased array analysis to decode the return microwave information. They could use the same system to read a DVD, and with the right software they could reconstruct at their end, the music on a audio cassett that is just laying around.The technology is like Wow! But look what they are doing with it!


Here is that site:

http://miami.indymedia.org/news/2005/05/1347.php

that supports my “phased array analysis”.


Next is the matter of detecting those 200 – 300 GHz microwave. The microwaves used for cooking ( microwave ovens) is about 2.45 GHz. So detectors used for detecting microwave leakage from such ovens are likely not to work for what we want. Cell phones and wireless LANS use microwaves of these lower frequencies. So again they may not be of much use. You will have to actually build the equipment for these 200 – 300 GHz microwaves.

First, try sourcing military electronics manufactures who may have actual detectors for that frequency microwaves. These detectors may be “tunnel detectors” or “diode detectors” or some other type. Then you will have to design a circuit that will give you a signal ( a beep or sound) when those microwaves are detected by the detector. You can use the detectors to surround and shield the circuit, so before they can use their beam to manipulate or damage your circuit.[DempseyB8 a victim, said: “ ..the perps have played games with my electrical voltmeter”] I suspect they can “play” with the programming on your computer directly from (Langley?) going through those said satellites.

The only problem with the detector and circuit suggested is that they may “reach” the circuit before it has a chance to respond. So the circuit has to be simple, quick and foolproof. The detector causes something to physically fall etc… fortunately they can’t alter gravity. Not at yet anyway, but I’m sure they are working on it. And then you will need a 200 -300 GHz transmitter to test that everything does actually work. If you know someone or have contacts in an engineering firm, or in the Physics or Engineering department of a University, I am sure they will help you.

Theoretically they could/ may also be using infrared radiation. But Wikipedia says these can be detected using cheap digital cameras. The infrared will leave a bright white glow on the picture. I don’t think they are using any other form of exotic radiation. These are too hard to control. But the may be working on it.


Speaking of “working on it” let me say how I suspect this diabolical piece of technology came about. As Einstein said: “ Every thing has changed except Man himself” The technology itself is not diabolical, it is what Man ( politicians) have chosen to do with it that is diabolical. Instead of cell phones we could be having mind-to-mind communications. The secrets of artificial intelligence could have been mastered by now. Advances in neurology, neuro-psychiatry as a new branch of science… the list goes on; but we all know what they have consciously chosen to do: “Lets go for the power-trip power hegemony instead!!! The Constitution, International Laws & Conventions, classic human decency, be damned! Lets hit the "super freeway (highway)" to our Napoleonic dreams ”

This is how I suspect the “ super freeway” came about: Back in the late 1950’s to 1960’s they ( eg DARPA) was designing and building a new type of radar to detect and track any possible incoming Soviet nuclear warheads. They were called phased array radar and sites were built in Alaska ( that one I know about). The resolution of these radars is so great, that they could stay in Washington, say, and spot a golf ball over Seattle. Then someone got the “bright idea”: “ Hey, if we use microwaves instead , they are short enough, then with the resolution of those phased array technology we could stay in space and STILL “see” individual neurons.” And the rest is their history, and other peoples nightmares and shattered lives. Then Bush 41 being a former CIA head knew where all these technologies were buried, what they were being used to do and had a hell‘ava scheme for using it.


And how did all this come to me? I was waching this program on cable, someone speaking about the capabilies of the X-band radars. He mentioned the Seattle story. I already knew about those properties of lasers. My little mind just put 1+1 together, "That's how they do it!"

There is also the poassibility that the are using the above with even more advanced stuff called scalar electrtomagnetics. This one they don't even teach in college. You can have a Phd in Physics, and would have never heard of that topic. Speak about HIGHLY CLASSIFIED.

BLOG: AND THE BEAT ( AGENDA? One-W-Order?) GOES ON

This just in folks. Read and be petrified. Literalists or literalists as cover?
( Goes with my previous post).

I can recall after hurricane Katrina I was watching a TV evangelists, a Pastor Smith I think, on Harvest TV saying how Bush had asked the Governor for authority to federalize the Louisiana National Guard and she had refused. Constitutional State Rights right back! The pastor was saying that this was a trial run that didn't quite work. So persistent are they, and coming right back again. Read..

I got the evangelist on tape (VCR no DVD) but my TV isn't working. Must be one of those low flying satellite again ( see DOSSIER).


The INTEL:

*******************

Federal Usurpation: Takover of comand over State National Guards
Sign posts of tyranny:

Congress has given Bush the authority to...
1) Declare Matrial Law without consulting them and without their vote.
2) Deploy Federal Troops domestically with command above State Governors to 'maintain order' in an 'emergency'.
3) Imprison US citizens without charge or trial by declaring them 'terrorists'.
He has a billion dollar plan in place to deploy the troops in case of a 'pandemic'.
He is having the prisons built in the southwest in case of an influx of 'illegal immigrants' courtasy of a Halliburten no bid contract.
NOW the Congress is discussing giving his authority over STATE NATIONAL GUARDSMEN ABOVE THE COMMAND OF STATE GOVERNORS...CLEARLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!!!
Yes folks, the stage is set. All he has to do is wake up and throw the switch.
...so tell me, what you gonna do about it? Bend over or fight?
Governors Bristle at Guard Proposal
By ROBERT TANNER, AP National Writer
51 minutes ago


CHARLESTON, S.C. - The nation's governors are closing ranks in opposition to a proposal in Congress that would let the president take control of the National Guard in emergencies without consent of governors.

The idea, spurred by the destruction and chaos that followed Hurricane Katrina's landfall in Louisiana and Mississippi, is part of a House-passed version of the National Defense Authorization Act. It has not yet been agreed to by the Senate.

The measure would remove the currently required consent of governors for the federalization of the Guard, which is shared between the individual states and the federal government.

"Federalization just for the sake of federalization makes no sense," said Gov. Kathleen Blanco of Louisiana, a Democrat who had rough relations with the Bush administration after the disaster last year. "You don't need federalization to get federal troops. ... Just making quick decisions can make things happen."
Gov. Mark Sanford of South Carolina, a Republican, said "a whole bunch of governors" were opposed to the idea after the proposed change was brought up in a private lunch meeting.

Some two dozen governors met in Charleston for three days of discussions at the annual summer gathering of the National Governors Association. The association's leaders sent a formal letter of opposition to House leaders last week.

The language in the House measure would let the president take control in case of "a serious natural or manmade disaster, accident, or catastrophe," according to the NGA.

"The idea of federalizing yet another function of government in America is a, the wrong direction, and b, counterproductive," Sanford said. "The system has worked quite well, notwithstanding what went wrong with Katrina."
----------end ----------------
It it time for all 50 states to send their national gaurdsmen to Washington?

*******************************************

PS: And these folks are just sitting around waiting for disasters without the need for scalar EM technologies that can manipulate the weather? Do these folks strike you as "leave it to chance folks" or "plan to the last detail folks"? Although.....the difference between paper and the real world can be large; Iraq?

LOBBYING FOR ARMAGEDDON

My post comment to the Alternet article
"Lobbying for Armageddon
Sarah Posner, AlterNet"

Article on literalists evangelists eg Pastor John Hagee, politicians
and "foreign" policy. Duck, cover and duct tape.

My Post:

*********************

Well, its about time we are having a discussion like this!

And folks, it doesn’t look good. With the present gang of leaders we have, including the Iranians…… we are in deep SH#@. People don’t seem to realize this or have come to terms with this.

These leaders, Iran included, are beholden to their political bases ,their agendas and notions. You want further evidence:

The administration must have known the eschatology of the Iranians from the transition period ( if they didn’t know before) The CIA could not have made such an oversight. And of course our dutiful “free” American corporate press, scratch that , corporate stenographers never gave the US/ Western public a heads-up on these aspects of the Iranian, having received no dictations to do so.

It seems to me , if your objective is a peaceful middle east, and you are armed with all this intel, then the prudent sequence of events would be; take the cosy-up of the Iranians in 2002, try to arrange a popular over throw of those clerics with their eschatology, ( there are clerics who want State/mosque separation), then democratize Iraq, and try to do it without “shock and awe”. Was this stupidity or worst yet intentional stupidity because these folks are beholden to…….

Then to make matters worst, they enter Iraq with all sort of religiosity perspective, Senators visiting ancient religious sites, not carrying plans to build civil society in Iraq, and then wonder why we are having a sectarian outcome there?

Yes folks, we are in deep stuff because of these literalists. Recall Chernobyl, Irish kids couldn’t drink local milk for how long.? It’s all our problem. WE have to take some hard look at out political leaderships.

And our “press”......... too bad the public can’t charge them with treason, for the dis-service they have done and continue to do.