Sunday, August 13, 2006



Those “mind interfering” weapons also called psychotronic weapons; are real. They are “highly” classified so the hard data on them is hard to come by , but I’m sure not impossible. I’m sure there are organizations out there working on this.

There is the following evidence as to their reality

a) Some victim organizations are meeting with some members of Congress.
on the matter.

b) The EU has passed a resolution on these weapons but it has not gone beyond that stage See:

On January 1999 the European Parliament passed a resolution where it (in paragraph 27) calls "for an international convention introducing a global ban on all developments and deployments of weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human beings".
It is our conviction that this ban can not be implemented without the global pressure of the informed general public on the governments. Our major objective is to get across to the general public the real threat which those weapons represent for human rights and democracy and to apply pressure on the governments and parliaments around the world to enact legislature which would prohibit the use of those devices to both government and private organizations as well as individuals.

c) These weapons are banned in the Russian Republic

See :

The Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation , STATE DUMA Committee on Security concluded November 30 2000 number 28/3:
On the project of Federal law "On Inclusion of Addendum to the Article 6 of the Federal law "On weapon".

The draft of the law proposes an addendum to Article 6 of the Federal law "On Weapons" with a regulation, in accordance with which the circulation, in a civilian and military capacity, of weapons and other objects, the offensive operations of which are based on the use of electro-magnetic radiation, infra-sonic radiation and ultra-sonic radiation, is prohibited on the territory of the Russian Federation

d) The weapons form part of the larger picture/agenda


Agenda xx:

There is no doubt that the US and the UK were behind the removal of the Shah. The problem for the US/UK was that the leading force inside Iran working to remove the Shah were progressives, led largely by the Iranian Socialist Workers’ Party. Therefore, in November 1978, President Carter named the Bilderberg group’s George Ball, another member of the Trilateral Commission, to head a special White House Iran task force under the National Security Council’s Brzezinski. Ball recommended that Washington drop support for the Shah of Iran and support the fundamentalist Islamic opposition of Khomeini.

Their scheme was based on a detailed study of the phenomenon of Islamic fundamentalism, as presented by British Islamic expert, Dr. Bernard Lewis … Lewis’s scheme was unveiled at the May 1979 Bilderberg meeting in Austria, endorsed the radical Muslim Brotherhood movement behind Khomeini, in order to promote balkanisation of the entire Muslim Near East along tribal and religious lines… The chaos would spread in what he termed an ‘Arc of Crisis,’ which would spill over into the Muslim regions of the Soviet Union.

And see

Zionist plan for expansion
1992 "Defense Planning Guidance"

Agenda xx+:

In 1996 an Israeli think tank headed by Richard Pearle drafted "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm". They outlined the plan to reshape the middle east. The first step is to be the removal of Saddam Hussein in Iraq. A war with Iraq will destabilize the entire Middle East, allowing governments in Syria, Iran, Lebanon, and other countries to be replaced.
In September of 2000 the Project for a New American Century (PNAC).published "Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century" gave the details of how their plans are to be carried out. Some key points are:
* Reposition permanently based forces to Southern Europe, Southeast Asia and the Middle East;
* Modernize U.S. forces, including enhancing our fighter aircraft, submarine and surface fleet capabilities;
* Develop and deploy a global missile defense system, and develop a strategic dominance of space by employing spaced based weapons;
* Control the "International Commons" of cyberspace; (The internet)
* Increase defense spending to a minimum of 3.8 percent of gross domestic product, up from the 3 percent currently spent. (Dubya did increase defense spending to exactly 3.8% after he took office.)
"The process of transformation", the plan said, "is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor." (Which we got on 9-11)

Aside from putting weapons in outer space, the most disturbing and ambitious element of the PNAC foreign policy blueprint was the plan to “democratize” the Middle East through military conquest.

Many thought/ assumed that the spaced –based weapons Richard Pearle spoke of were the type of space weapons being planned in the Reagan era. No, they were the psychotronic weapons. These technologies form an integral part of the global agenda. Middle East included.

The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
, represents the codification of what it means to be a civilized human being and a civilized society in the 20th century and beyond. The elites of this planet, were globe hopping espousing this standard. Then all of a sudden, because of agendas, a convergence of those with the US far right, that codified standard no , longer need to exists if you have these weapons and can use them illegally, without due process of law?

No, I don’t think so!! We need to get back to that standard.. These vile people we have elected.!

Babacek said : “Our major objective is to get across to the general public the real threat which those weapons represent for human rights and democracy..”

The hard classified data isn’t needed at this point. To wait is to play into the hands of those with the agendas.

I hope there are organizations out there putting together a case based on the International Convention.. and the usage of these technologies/weapons, having learnt from that group in Spain who have brought a case against Pinoche of Chile.


The agendas/ game-plan being played out now in the middle east is the implementation of that the May 1979 Bilderberg meeting in Austria.
It raises a lot of questions on so much history right up to now.
Can you see some of these questions?

These technologies are right in there being used to the hilt, no doubt.
A recent possible example: after almost a year of pre-planning how to get Hezbullah to "make the incident claimed required".
( All the details of Hezbullas rockets could have been first brought to the
UN Security Council )

Some one said ;” Religions like political and social systems evolve and if left in peace they progress according to the understanding and ethics of the people.”

That may be so given certain parameters. But we don’t have the time for that right now. We should hold how, say, the Scandinavian countries behave towards each other as a modern civilized norm for all countries. If two or even one of the parties feel they have to actively pursue a conflagration policy, human dynamics say this will be self-fulfilling. Bilderberg knew this about the Mullahs ( more questions) .

I say place or have the Mullahs place themselves in a State/Mosque separation context which will espouse that modern civilized norm for behaviour between countries, while we in the west and others, can work on those over here with their “agendas and conflagrations” to get them to REALLY conform to that norm.

And of course all adhering to the “International Convention on Human Rights..”


Post a Comment

<< Home